The Walkers of Norton & the Tragedy of the 'Captain'

  • 29 Apr 2025
  • Military
  • Back

Norton Villa (The Firs) was occupied in the mid-19th century by the Walker family connected by marriage to the Havergals; Frances Ridley Havergal, whose hymns and poems enjoyed immense popularity. Mrs. Walker was a progressive lady, the village having no schoolmaster, held classes in her home till 1832, and thereafter established a day school, and formed a lending library for parishioners in her own home.

A famous tragedy took its toll of the family in the 1870s. One of the Walker's son-in-laws became the statesman, H.E Childers, First Lord of the Admiralty, who had much to do with the development of the Dreadnought, an armoured ship names the 'Captain. The ship had heavy gun turrets and was covered with armoured steel plates. She proved to be top-heavy, and on her first voyage, returning from Gibraltar, she turned turtle in the Bay of Biscay. Among those who lost their lives was Midshipman Leonard Childers, son of the First Lord, and grandson of Mr. and Mrs. Walker. The loss of his son and all on board is said to have caused Childers breakdown in health, and to have ended his political career.

 

Pride and Peril: The Tragic Tale of HMS Captain and the Victorian Navy's Hubris
The year 1870 witnessed Great Britain, the reigning power of the seas, proudly displaying its formidable Royal Navy. Among the ironclad behemoths of this fleet was HMS Captain, an experimental warship that had been lauded as the "Pride of the Victorian Navy". This innovative "sail-and-steam" vessel, designed to wield the most powerful artillery of the era within revolving turrets, was envisioned as the next step in maintaining Britain's naval supremacy in an age of rapidly advancing technology. However, this symbol of progress met a swift and devastating end. Just a few months after entering service in April 1870 , disaster struck off Cape Finisterre, Spain. In the early hours of September 7th, HMS Captain succumbed to a gale, capsizing and plunging nearly 500 souls, including her celebrated designer, Captain Cowper Phipps Coles, into the depths of the Atlantic. The news of this catastrophe reached London on September 10th, as reported by The Times , sending shockwaves across the nation and igniting widespread grief and sympathy for the families of those lost.  

 
HMS Captain represented a bold attempt to create a cutting-edge warship capable of long-range deployment across the Atlantic and powerful enough to defeat any adversary. Her design incorporated a relatively low freeboard of a mere 6.5 feet (2 meters) combined with an extensive sail plan boasting 50,000 square feet of canvas. This hybrid approach aimed to blend the speed and maneuverability provided by her twin screw steam engines with the extended range and fuel efficiency of sail power. The centerpiece of her offensive capability was the revolutionary concept of mounting massive naval guns within rotating armored turrets, a concept championed by Captain Cowper Phipps Coles. Coles was a fervent advocate for this technology and had actively campaigned against alternative designs favored by the Admiralty, pushing his vision of a low-freeboard turret ship. However, this novel design was not without its inherent dangers. Concerns regarding the ship's low freeboard and potentially unstable high center of gravity were voiced early in the design process by prominent figures within the Admiralty, including the Controller of the Navy, Vice Admiral Robert Spencer Robinson, and the Chief Constructor, Edward James Reed, as early as 1866. Reed specifically criticized the plans that year, highlighting the potential for excessive weight and instability. While Coles' initial calculations estimated a freeboard of 8 feet (2.4 meters) , modifications during the design phase and a lack of rigorous oversight during construction, exacerbated by Coles' prolonged illness , resulted in the ship being significantly heavier than originally intended – by a substantial 735 long tons (747 tonnes). This added weight caused HMS Captain to sit 22 inches (0.56 meters) lower in the water than planned, reducing her freeboard to a perilous 6 feet 6 inches (1.98 meters). To illustrate the severity of this design choice, the contemporary turret ship HMS Monarch had a freeboard of 14 feet (4.3 meters) , more than double that of the ill-fated Captain.  

Despite the clear reservations expressed by experienced naval architects such as Reed and Robinson , these warnings were ultimately dismissed during the ship's sea trials. This decision, potentially influenced by the desire to showcase a groundbreaking warship and the persuasive nature of Captain Coles , would have devastating consequences. Reports indicated that the ship's low freeboard contributed to a feeling of "sluggishness" in comparison to HMS Monarch. Furthermore, during gunnery exercises, while HMS Captain demonstrated her firepower by achieving three out of four hits with her initial salvo , the act of firing caused the vessel to roll heavily, reaching an inclination of approximately 20 degrees. This was alarmingly close to the calculated capsize threshold of just 21 degrees. Adding to the inherent instability was the fact that HMS Captain was excessively rigged with a vast expanse of 50,000 square feet of sails supported by rigid masts , making her dangerously top-heavy. The decision to proceed with the commissioning and deployment of HMS Captain, despite these well-documented indicators of instability, suggests a degree of overconfidence within the Royal Navy, perhaps fueled by national pride in their technological advancements or a reluctance to acknowledge potential flaws in a highly publicized and politically supported project. The strong public backing for Coles' design might have inadvertently contributed to an environment where dissenting expert opinions were undervalued or ignored. The failure to heed these warnings and address the clear signs of instability observed during trials directly led to the deployment of a vessel with known and significant safety deficiencies. This critical oversight formed a crucial link in the chain of events that culminated in the tragic loss of HMS Captain.  

 
On the afternoon of September 6th, 1870, HMS Captain was sailing off Cape Finisterre, a region notorious for its violent autumn gales , as part of a large fleet comprising 11 capital ships from the combined Channel and Mediterranean Squadrons. This deployment was intended as a demonstration of British naval power, a "diplomatic show of force". The fleet encountered a sudden and severe gale originating from the southwest, accompanied by intense squalls. While Admiral Milne, aboard the HMS Lord Warden, described the weather as a "sudden S.W. gale; very heavy squalls" , experienced sailors on more traditionally designed ships within the same squadron considered the conditions to be "unexceptional" or even "moderate" , highlighting the particular vulnerability of HMS Captain to such weather. As the wind intensified throughout the day , the crew of HMS Captain, along with sailors on other hybrid sail-and-steam ships in the squadron, would have been actively working aloft to reef and furl the sails, reducing the amount of canvas exposed to the increasing wind. Tellingly, the commander-in-chief of the squadron had initially boarded HMS Captain to personally observe her performance. However, he made the decision to return to his flagship, HMS Lord Warden, a move likely prompted by the Captain's alarming tendency to heel sharply from side to side, with seawater crashing across her decks. This firsthand observation by a senior officer, just hours before the catastrophe, serves as a stark premonition of the impending disaster. At approximately midnight on September 7th, the "revolutionary low freeboard, but heavily masted, ironclad turret frigate capsized and sank off cape Finisterre". The event occurred with startling rapidity, in a "dark and stormy night, without a moment's warning" , leaving the crew with virtually no time to react effectively. They were unable to cut away the remaining sails in an attempt to right the ship. Admiral Sir Alexander Milne, from the HMS Lord Warden, reported in his dispatch at 5 p.m. on September 7th that HMS Captain had been in close proximity to his vessel at 2 a.m. but was missing by daybreak. Later that afternoon, only wreckage such as boats and spars were discovered. Admiral Milne concluded that HMS Captain must have foundered suddenly during the night, likely overwhelmed by one of the heavy squalls that caught her in a particularly vulnerable state. The fact that the gale was not considered severe by other ships in the fleet strongly suggests that the inherent design flaws of HMS Captain were the primary factors contributing to her demise, rather than an exceptionally violent storm. The combination of her dangerously low freeboard , high center of gravity , and the strong southwest gale with its powerful squalls created a perfect storm of conditions that caused the vessel to heel over beyond her point of recovery, leading to the catastrophic capsize. This incident serves as a grim reminder that even innovative naval designs must be rigorously tested and proven seaworthy across a range of expected weather conditions before being deployed in potentially hazardous environments.  

 
The sinking of HMS Captain resulted in a staggering loss of life. Out of a crew of approximately 499 men (some sources indicate "over 500" or "nearly 500" ), only 18 survived the disaster. Among those who perished were numerous distinguished officers of the Royal Navy, including Captain Cowper Phipps Coles himself, who was aboard in an observational capacity , and Leonard Childers, the youngest son of Hugh Childers, the First Lord of the Admiralty. The commanding officer of HMS Captain was Captain Hugh Talbot Burgoyne VC. The sole surviving officer was Gunner James May, who was positioned inside one of the gun turrets when the ship rolled over and subsequently provided a harrowing account of the sinking. The majority of the survivors were men who happened to be on the upper deck at the time of the capsize, engaged in the routine task of changing watch and attempting to manage the sails in the worsening weather. This small group included three boys, four ordinary seamen, five able seamen, one leading seaman, and four petty officers. The loss of HMS Captain stands as one of the British Royal Navy's most devastating peacetime losses, exceeding the number of British fatalities at the famed Battle of Trafalgar in 1805, where approximately 450 British sailors lost their lives. This comparison starkly illustrates the magnitude of the catastrophe, highlighting the devastating consequences of a design failure compared to even a major naval engagement. The Times newspaper, reporting on the tragedy, expressed profound sorrow, lamenting the loss of "one of the finest ships in the world, manned by one of the finest crews". The disaster deeply affected Queen Victoria and sent a wave of shock and mourning across the entire nation , being widely regarded as a national catastrophe. The fact that the victims included not only ordinary sailors but also prominent officers and the very designer of the ship amplified the sense of national loss and undoubtedly fueled the intense public reaction.  

The memory of those lost in the sinking of HMS Captain is preserved through prominent memorials, most notably two large copper plaques located in St Paul's Cathedral in London. One plaque provides the official account of the disaster and lists the names of the ship's officers, while the other commemorates the seamen, Royal Marines, and young boys who perished. Additionally, Westminster Abbey features a stained-glass window as a tribute to the victims. The profound loss of life triggered significant public outrage and a nationwide outpouring of sympathy for the bereaved families. This strong public reaction likely exerted considerable pressure on the Admiralty to conduct a thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding the sinking. Subsequently, a formal court-martial was convened to examine the causes of the disaster. The findings of this inquiry unequivocally concluded that the inherent instability of HMS Captain, stemming directly from her design and construction, was the primary factor that led to the capsize. The tragedy became a stark example of the potential consequences of flawed naval architecture and a "poster child of stability calculations gone wrong". The sinking of HMS Captain prompted a critical re-evaluation of naval design principles and practices within the Royal Navy. This devastating event undoubtedly contributed to a more cautious and rigorous approach in the design and construction of future warships, particularly those incorporating innovative and potentially risky technologies such as rotating turrets and significantly reduced freeboards.  

 
Even after more than a century and a half, the final resting place of HMS Captain remains undiscovered. However, the University of Wolverhampton (UoW) is currently spearheading an international, multi-institutional effort to locate the wreck of this historically significant vessel off the coast of Cape Finisterre, Spain. Recent expeditions, employing advanced underwater survey technology like multi-beam echosounders , have identified four unidentified shipwrecks in the area where local Galician fishermen have traditionally believed the Captain sank. Notably, the fourth of these discovered wrecks exhibits dimensions and a general configuration that closely resemble those of HMS Captain. These ongoing efforts, led by maritime historian Dr. Howard Fuller , aim to achieve definitive identification of the wreck through the use of side-scan sonar and Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) equipped with cameras. Successfully locating the wreck could potentially provide further valuable insights into the final moments of the ship and the circumstances of her sinking. The considerable depth at which the wreck is believed to lie, between 1,300 and 1,700 meters (nearly a mile below the surface) , presents significant logistical and technical challenges for any potential exploration. In a unique effort to support the search, master painter Geoff Hunt has created a large-scale oil painting depicting the foundering of HMS Captain, with proceeds from the sale of museum-quality prints going towards funding the ongoing expeditions. The continued dedication to finding HMS Captain underscores the enduring impact of this maritime tragedy on British naval history and the collective memory of the nation. It reflects a persistent desire for closure and a commitment to fully understanding the events that led to the loss of this innovative but ultimately flawed warship.  

 
In conclusion, the sinking of HMS Captain serves as a profound and tragic illustration of the potential dangers inherent in pushing the boundaries of naval technology without sufficient caution and rigorous oversight. The confluence of flawed design choices, the dismissal of expert warnings, and perhaps a degree of overconfidence in the face of rapid technological advancement in the Victorian era ultimately led to this devastating peacetime loss for the Royal Navy. The catastrophic loss of nearly 500 lives prompted significant introspection within the naval establishment and the nation as a whole, likely contributing to a more measured and thorough approach to warship design and construction in subsequent years. While the "Pride of the Victorian Navy" met a premature and devastating end off the Spanish coast, her story endures as a powerful cautionary tale in the annals of maritime history, emphasizing the critical importance of sound engineering principles, comprehensive risk assessment, and the absolute necessity of heeding expert counsel when the lives of hundreds of sailors are at stake in the pursuit of innovation.

The_sinking_of_HMS_Captain as featured in the Illustrated London News 24 Sept 1870

The Sinking of HMS Captain - Credit Edwin Weedon The illustrated London News 24th Sept 1870